Northeast Modern Language Association (NeMLA)
March 21-24, 2013
Boston, Massachusetts
Host Institution: Tufts University
CFP #1: Engendering
the Victorian Female Poet
There has been a historic tide of scholarship arguing the
merits of Victorian poetry written by women. From Aurora Leigh to “Goblin Market,” nineteenth-century female
poets created a canon of verse that questioned gender categories and troubled
the status quo. While scholars from Oliphant to W.M. Rossetti added valuable
interpretations that legitimized the genre, contemporary critics such as
Armstrong, Tucker, and Prins have used modern lenses to probe the subtleties
inherent in the work of a “poetess.” This roundtable will discuss the ways
gender is mapped onto and inherent in nineteenth-century female poetics. We
will probe how the female poet changed/expanded/problematized form, and how
poets addressed the sexual, moral and class conventions of their time. What
were the cultural responses to these poems, and what were some significant male
responses? What was the effect of working-class poems authored by women? How
did the concept of boundaries smite or enforce a female poet’s project? We will
also discuss the transatlantic implications of publishing and editing, as well
as how poets represented the adversity of gender in their verse—what Barrett
Browning called a “disheveled strength in agony.”
This roundtable examines the ways gender is mapped
onto and inherent in verse of Victorian female poets. Participants should
examine through theoretical lenses canonic or non-canonic poems (metapoems,
verse-novels, lyric, epic, sonnet, elegy) throughout the long
nineteenth-century. 500 word abstract/CV by 9/30 to blavin@optonline.net with
subject line “NeMLA VFP”
CFP #2: Nineteenth-century
Eco-Poetics
How does nature operate in nineteenth-century poetry? From
Arnold’s “Scholar-Gypsy” to Leopardi’s “La Ginestra,” nineteenth-century poets
privileged the nature motif in their verse. While literary critics have queried
these poetic projects by focusing on Empire, religion, gender, and form, few
scholars have explored eco-critical approaches to this global canon. This panel
will consider poems where science interrogates landscape, faith interacts with
nature, and industrialization pocks the pastoral. We will begin by exploring
how the systematic and organized study of nature—and the advent of the natural
sciences—impacted verse forms. We will also ask how literary legacies, such as
Romanticism, influenced the positioning of nature in the nineteenth-century
verse. Panelists will explore through theoretical lenses the evolving notions
of nature and how they manifest in the poetry of various nation-states. We will
query how the genre responded to the burgeoning sciences and technological innovations,
and we will explore the theoretical implications of a nineteenth-century
eco-poetics.
This panel queries how nineteenth-century poets
privileged the nature motif in their verse. Panelists should examine through
theoretical lenses canonic or non-canonic poems (lyric, epic, sonnet,
verse-novel, elegy, etc.) that manifest nature in verse. 500 word Abstract/CV
by 9/30 to blavin@optonline.net with
subject line “NeMLA 19th Eco_Poetics”